Why Monopolies are bad

ummm... navel... raw navel...Ok, so Kasia didn’t say anything about monopolies, but her story about AT&T raising her internet fees because she doesn’t subscribe to Cable TV is a good example of what can go wrong if a company ‘owns’ a particular market and there isn’t any real competition for that market…

Now, I also think the broadband market is too ‘new’ to really have any monopolies, but with all of the subsidization of broadband by hardware manufacturers, large telecom and cable companies and even the government going on in the past 3-5 years, it makes sense that prices have to go up as adoption slows down (is it slowing down yet?) but it’s still sucks that cable internet access could cost $15 more/year for a loyal customer just because they aren’t a cable TV subscriber…

Sad effect of fucked up ethics in corporate America I think too… so many angles to this it’s rediculous.


One Response to “Why Monopolies are bad”  

  1. Gravatar Icon 1 Bob

    And AT*T is the worst, by far, of any of the broadband companies. They shoulda stuck with long distance and left it at that. I used to have AT&T Broadband and got screwed, royally. I now have Bellsouth DSL and haven’t had a single problem. I even have a page dedicated to my AT&T problems (http://www.bobsawyer.com/mediaonestinks/) that still receives several visitors a week via web searches for “AT&T” … hehehe…

Leave a Reply





Bad Behavior has blocked 4055 access attempts in the last 7 days.