How to NOT hire a qualified job-seeker
Published 5 years, 7 months ago in leadership + management
So, you need to hire someone with some technical savvy to run your website?
Don’t do what the company that Angie is talking about here did:
People who might actually have these skills will never respond to this ad. There are a few people out there who may have 95% of the skills you’re looking for, with nearly all the experience you require. There may be quite a few people who have 75% of the skills you are looking for. These are all very talented people, to have even met 75% of the goals set out by this job ad. But by putting together a job ad like the one above ó something that absolutely screams ìWe don’t know what we’re doing!î ó you’ve guaranteed that none of these very talented people would ever want to come to work for you.
Even in this recession, where there are more out-of-work tech people than ever, employers and employees both have to remember that there is such a thing as mutual respect. If you want us to learn your business, take a bit of time to learn ours. At the very least, avoid laundry lists of requirements if you have no idea what they mean. Build up a relationship of trust with us and we will reward you with loyalty and dedication, not to mention the inevitable overtime that most tech people go through at least occasionally. Don’t insult us, and we won’t insult you.
Angie disects the job posting that she saw quite well, and it’s great lesson for anyone that might work in HR to learn, and for anyone in a ‘hiring authority’ position to know, just in case you have to hire through your HR department.
4 Responses to “How to NOT hire a qualified job-seeker”
- 1 Trackback on Jan 28th, 2003 at 12:34 pm
- 2 Trackback on Jan 28th, 2003 at 6:22 pm
Leave a Reply
Search
Subscribe
Archives
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- May 2002
Categories
- asides (445)
- baby (6)
- design + dev (142)
- for sale (7)
- get a job (11)
- investing (6)
- leadership + management (145)
- life stories (251)
- macintosh (320)
- marketing + advertising (223)
- Moveable Type (52)
- organization (6)
- photography + video (68)
- publishing + content (136)
- random (239)
- Saab (1)
- sales and selling (93)
- small business (147)
- stuff (67)
- sysadmin (40)
- travel (42)
- Video (2)
- windows (69)
- WordPress (13)

oh.my.gawd. your images are getting much better now that you have the “on/off” option.
Wow, I have never seen as scary an ad, or one that screams “run away! run away!” as much as that one does. Even before reading it I was scared, you can tell by the number of upper/lower case mixes and “/”’s that the content itself is just scary.