<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snapster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inluminent.com/2003/07/24/snapster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inluminent.com/2003/07/24/snapster/</link>
	<description>my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Harrell</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2003/07/24/snapster/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Harrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=724#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s disappointing that Cringely would make such an obvious error. His &quot;Snapster&quot; idea, which he claims is &quot;built on the legal concept of Fair Use,&quot; is not actually compatible with the legal concept of fair use. So the only way it could work is if the Snapster corporate entity purchased not just copies of music, but the *rights* to that music. He&#039;s gonna need a lot more startup capital than $2 million.



But in a larger sense, I find this column to be symptomatic of a wider problem: people generally don&#039;t understand the notion of fair use. I mean, the meaning is right there in the name: fair use, by definition, must be *fair*. Too many people think that fair use means &quot;I can do whatever I want, cause I bought it&quot; or, like Cringely, that fair use is a legal system in which to find loopholes.



It&#039;s a shame, really. It&#039;s such a simple idea.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s disappointing that Cringely would make such an obvious error. His &#8220;Snapster&#8221; idea, which he claims is &#8220;built on the legal concept of Fair Use,&#8221; is not actually compatible with the legal concept of fair use. So the only way it could work is if the Snapster corporate entity purchased not just copies of music, but the *rights* to that music. He&#8217;s gonna need a lot more startup capital than $2 million.</p>
<p>But in a larger sense, I find this column to be symptomatic of a wider problem: people generally don&#8217;t understand the notion of fair use. I mean, the meaning is right there in the name: fair use, by definition, must be *fair*. Too many people think that fair use means &#8220;I can do whatever I want, cause I bought it&#8221; or, like Cringely, that fair use is a legal system in which to find loopholes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame, really. It&#8217;s such a simple idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
