Comments on: SCO lawsuits funded by Microsoft? http://inluminent.com/2004/03/04/sco-lawsuits-funded-by-microsoft/ my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff... Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:44:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: paul http://inluminent.com/2004/03/04/sco-lawsuits-funded-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1597 paul Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://inluminent.com/?p=879#comment-1597 I thought this was pretty widely known? You can see an annotated document (filed with the Halloween Documents: <a href="http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html">http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html</a> ) and make your own call . . . I thought this was pretty widely known? You can see an annotated document (filed with the Halloween Documents: http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html ) and make your own call . . .

]]> By: andrea http://inluminent.com/2004/03/04/sco-lawsuits-funded-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1598 andrea Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://inluminent.com/?p=879#comment-1598 There is a big interest from Microsoft to help .... SCO could be a perfect "tool" for them ... There is a big interest from Microsoft to help ….

SCO could be a perfect “tool” for them …

]]> By: Jeremy C. Wright http://inluminent.com/2004/03/04/sco-lawsuits-funded-by-microsoft/comment-page-1/#comment-1599 Jeremy C. Wright Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://inluminent.com/?p=879#comment-1599 Major news has already "died" this. Old news, and denied by both parties. The consultant has already admitted to blowing up the truth. The Halloween X document is a joke in which a zealout took 100 things out of context, used bad math, and pointed the finger squarely in the wrong direction. Major news has already “died” this. Old news, and denied by both parties. The consultant has already admitted to blowing up the truth.

The Halloween X document is a joke in which a zealout took 100 things out of context, used bad math, and pointed the finger squarely in the wrong direction.

]]>