<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail - testing for spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/</link>
	<description>my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gales</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Gales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=914#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>I have found it sucks at spam filtering... At least compared to Spam Sieve. I have a feeling it will get much better (save them a ton of $$$ on disk space).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found it sucks at spam filtering&#8230; At least compared to Spam Sieve. I have a feeling it will get much better (save them a ton of $$$ on disk space).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Pratt</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=914#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>I've published my address, prattboy@gmail.com for people to spam me and have been keeping track of the results at &lt;a href="http://gmail.prattboy.net/"&gt;http://gmail.prattboy.net/&lt;/a&gt; 



So far results have been less than stellar, but we'll see what happens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve published my address, <a href="mailto:prattboy@gmail.com">prattboy@gmail.com</a> for people to spam me and have been keeping track of the results at <a href="http://gmail.prattboy.net/">http://gmail.prattboy.net/</a> </p>
<p>So far results have been less than stellar, but we&#8217;ll see what happens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.K. Sample, III</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>C.K. Sample, III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=914#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>I've been trying to get people to fill my gmail account up to its 1GB limit to see what happens.  After a post on /. I received a flurry of so-so response and have it up to 180MB of email.  During the process, I noticed that the SPAM filter in Gmail only picked up the really 'well-known' I AM PRIME-MINISTER OF NGUMBA type spam.  Also, and potentially much more dangerous, although it let through about 15 emails from one email address, it suddenly moved any new messages to spam with no discernible reason as to why.  



However, I do like Gmail okay.  I invited myself to a second account that I will not be publishing.  However, if you want to check it out look through the archives on my site and feel free to send more spam and large attachments to cksampleiii@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to get people to fill my gmail account up to its 1GB limit to see what happens.  After a post on /. I received a flurry of so-so response and have it up to 180MB of email.  During the process, I noticed that the SPAM filter in Gmail only picked up the really &#8216;well-known&#8217; I AM PRIME-MINISTER OF NGUMBA type spam.  Also, and potentially much more dangerous, although it let through about 15 emails from one email address, it suddenly moved any new messages to spam with no discernible reason as to why.  </p>
<p>However, I do like Gmail okay.  I invited myself to a second account that I will not be publishing.  However, if you want to check it out look through the archives on my site and feel free to send more spam and large attachments to <a href="mailto:cksampleiii@gmail.com">cksampleiii@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Lee</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=914#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>If you want to keep using your own domain name email addys and filter them for spam, just make them autoforward to your gMail account. At least temporarily, just to check if it works. Then if you don't like it, you can turn off autoforwarding of your domain accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to keep using your own domain name email addys and filter them for spam, just make them autoforward to your gMail account. At least temporarily, just to check if it works. Then if you don&#8217;t like it, you can turn off autoforwarding of your domain accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=914#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>My gmail address was posted on a very popular site yesteray. The Nigerians found me today :) Oh well.  I did notice that the spam filter on Gmail claims to get better with time. Maybe it is baeysian and needs to be trained before it gets effective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My gmail address was posted on a very popular site yesteray. The Nigerians found me today <img src='http://inluminent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Oh well.  I did notice that the spam filter on Gmail claims to get better with time. Maybe it is baeysian and needs to be trained before it gets effective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krista</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2004/05/11/gmail-testing-for-spam/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Krista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=914#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>I'm not usually this far behind the times... I'd love to have an invite for Gmail testing. Thank you!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not usually this far behind the times&#8230; I&#8217;d love to have an invite for Gmail testing. Thank you!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
