<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google shows no love for Mac users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/</link>
	<description>my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:43:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FuzzyBlog &#187; New Google Deskbar Rocks</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/comment-page-1/#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>FuzzyBlog &#187; New Google Deskbar Rocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>[...] My oh my.&#160; I&#8217;m just plain astonished at the rich, frothy goodness that is Google Sidebar / Google Desktop 2.0 / whatever the heck they call it.&#160; This thing is bloody well rocking my world.&#160; Yes I know that I&#8217;m the last person on the planet to try this new thing from Google which came out more than 6 months ago.&#160; And I agree, like Inluminent says so well, that there need to be Mac versions of Google stuff.&#160; That said, given that I&#8217;m a professional search guy, I&#8217;ve seen this type of thing before.&#160; Verity did it.&#160; Fulcrum did it.&#160; DTSearch did it.&#160; Others have done it.&#160; None of them seem to have done the overall issues of local search as well (note &#8212; I haven&#8217;t looked at Yahoo&#8217;s stuff or MSN&#8217;s stuff yet; when I have time).&#160; Google really nailed this one well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My oh my.&nbsp; I&#8217;m just plain astonished at the rich, frothy goodness that is Google Sidebar / Google Desktop 2.0 / whatever the heck they call it.&nbsp; This thing is bloody well rocking my world.&nbsp; Yes I know that I&#8217;m the last person on the planet to try this new thing from Google which came out more than 6 months ago.&nbsp; And I agree, like Inluminent says so well, that there need to be Mac versions of Google stuff.&nbsp; That said, given that I&#8217;m a professional search guy, I&#8217;ve seen this type of thing before.&nbsp; Verity did it.&nbsp; Fulcrum did it.&nbsp; DTSearch did it.&nbsp; Others have done it.&nbsp; None of them seem to have done the overall issues of local search as well (note &#8212; I haven&#8217;t looked at Yahoo&#8217;s stuff or MSN&#8217;s stuff yet; when I have time).&nbsp; Google really nailed this one well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/comment-page-1/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/#comment-3975</guid>
		<description>OK, I don&#039;t get it. I love Firefox because it does work. On everything. Yes, I love macs as much as the next mac geek, but Safari just doesn&#039;t cut it. Why continue the love affair?

I thought I was going to bolster my comments with analysis (from a leading local news Web site) that Mozilla was robbing so much market from Safari that it becomes less and less a segment worth catering to, but I was surprised to find the Safari market growing (along with Mac OS). Just a tad, but a growth, none-the-less. I can&#039;t exactly cross browser us against OS but I can compare them. It seems that since Jan 1,  3.4% of our site visitors use Safari, out of the 5.7% that us Mac OS. Since Oct. 1, 4.1% use Safari, out of 6.1% that use Mac OS.

Oh, well. I still love Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I don&#8217;t get it. I love Firefox because it does work. On everything. Yes, I love macs as much as the next mac geek, but Safari just doesn&#8217;t cut it. Why continue the love affair?</p>
<p>I thought I was going to bolster my comments with analysis (from a leading local news Web site) that Mozilla was robbing so much market from Safari that it becomes less and less a segment worth catering to, but I was surprised to find the Safari market growing (along with Mac OS). Just a tad, but a growth, none-the-less. I can&#8217;t exactly cross browser us against OS but I can compare them. It seems that since Jan 1,  3.4% of our site visitors use Safari, out of the 5.7% that us Mac OS. Since Oct. 1, 4.1% use Safari, out of 6.1% that use Mac OS.</p>
<p>Oh, well. I still love Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mardoen</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/comment-page-1/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>mardoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/2005/11/16/google-shows-no-love-for-mac-users/#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t used Google Analytics myself, but the problem might be that they are using a canvas page element for the graphics instead of loading external image files (I don&#039;t know if they do). Safari has at least one bug related to canvas and CSS usage; there is an easy workaround for this though (until the WebKit team fixes bug 4884).

See http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/09/safari_canvas_bug/ -- it would be nice if someone checked if they are indeed using canvas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used Google Analytics myself, but the problem might be that they are using a canvas page element for the graphics instead of loading external image files (I don&#8217;t know if they do). Safari has at least one bug related to canvas and CSS usage; there is an easy workaround for this though (until the WebKit team fixes bug 4884).</p>
<p>See <a href="http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/09/safari_canvas_bug/" rel="nofollow">http://dekstop.de/weblog/2005/09/safari_canvas_bug/</a> &#8212; it would be nice if someone checked if they are indeed using canvas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->