<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Composition and Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/</link>
	<description>my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Blake</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=1200#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>I like the pictures -- beautiful subject. ;)  Regarding a technical photo critique, I'm not really a photographer and don't know your camera, but your composition was good as far as placing the "interesting points" of the picture according to the rule of thirds -- i.e. the eyes.  (Of course when looking at a face we subconsciously can't resist staring at the eyes to attempt eye contact.)  I would say that the depth of field/focus is too narrow, though, because both eyes aren't in focus.  In the first picture, Jack's left eye is in the rule of third point, but is out of focus.  Anyway, those are my two cents!  I like your blog as well.  Thanks for writing and sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the pictures &#8212; beautiful subject. <img src='http://inluminent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Regarding a technical photo critique, I&#8217;m not really a photographer and don&#8217;t know your camera, but your composition was good as far as placing the &#8220;interesting points&#8221; of the picture according to the rule of thirds &#8212; i.e. the eyes.  (Of course when looking at a face we subconsciously can&#8217;t resist staring at the eyes to attempt eye contact.)  I would say that the depth of field/focus is too narrow, though, because both eyes aren&#8217;t in focus.  In the first picture, Jack&#8217;s left eye is in the rule of third point, but is out of focus.  Anyway, those are my two cents!  I like your blog as well.  Thanks for writing and sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Oscar</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=1200#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>The first one is clearer and has this tender beseeching expression and the tiny ear in the corner is cute. But I like the second because it is dreamier and Jack is looking into the dark, he is more confident. The cropping has more impact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one is clearer and has this tender beseeching expression and the tiny ear in the corner is cute. But I like the second because it is dreamier and Jack is looking into the dark, he is more confident. The cropping has more impact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
