<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Composition and Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/</link>
	<description>my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Blake</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=1200#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>I like the pictures -- beautiful subject. ;)  Regarding a technical photo critique, I&#039;m not really a photographer and don&#039;t know your camera, but your composition was good as far as placing the &quot;interesting points&quot; of the picture according to the rule of thirds -- i.e. the eyes.  (Of course when looking at a face we subconsciously can&#039;t resist staring at the eyes to attempt eye contact.)  I would say that the depth of field/focus is too narrow, though, because both eyes aren&#039;t in focus.  In the first picture, Jack&#039;s left eye is in the rule of third point, but is out of focus.  Anyway, those are my two cents!  I like your blog as well.  Thanks for writing and sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the pictures &#8212; beautiful subject. <img src='http://inluminent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Regarding a technical photo critique, I&#8217;m not really a photographer and don&#8217;t know your camera, but your composition was good as far as placing the &#8220;interesting points&#8221; of the picture according to the rule of thirds &#8212; i.e. the eyes.  (Of course when looking at a face we subconsciously can&#8217;t resist staring at the eyes to attempt eye contact.)  I would say that the depth of field/focus is too narrow, though, because both eyes aren&#8217;t in focus.  In the first picture, Jack&#8217;s left eye is in the rule of third point, but is out of focus.  Anyway, those are my two cents!  I like your blog as well.  Thanks for writing and sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.Oscar</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2005/12/07/composition-and-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator>J.Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/?p=1200#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>The first one is clearer and has this tender beseeching expression and the tiny ear in the corner is cute. But I like the second because it is dreamier and Jack is looking into the dark, he is more confident. The cropping has more impact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one is clearer and has this tender beseeching expression and the tiny ear in the corner is cute. But I like the second because it is dreamier and Jack is looking into the dark, he is more confident. The cropping has more impact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->