<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: speed up windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inluminent.com/2006/01/30/speed-up-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inluminent.com/2006/01/30/speed-up-windows/</link>
	<description>my comments on business, marketing, advertising, email, CAN-SPAM, selling as a profession, photography, computers and other stuff...</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: i m too dvd ripper</title>
		<link>http://inluminent.com/2006/01/30/speed-up-windows/#comment-151621</link>
		<dc:creator>i m too dvd ripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inluminent.com/2006/01/30/speed-up-windows/#comment-151621</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;i m too dvd ripper...&lt;/strong&gt;

Further, the default installs take considerably different amounts of RAM to run. XP takes 43. 15MB to run, Vista takes 235MB ( five times as much). And that’ s not including the system cache. In total, on a default install, XP consumes 207MB and Vist...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>i m too dvd ripper&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Further, the default installs take considerably different amounts of RAM to run. XP takes 43. 15MB to run, Vista takes 235MB ( five times as much). And that’ s not including the system cache. In total, on a default install, XP consumes 207MB and Vist&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
